<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>afgelocal1923.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afgelocal1923.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org</link>
	<description>American Federation of Government Employees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IMPORTANT: SSA CONTRACT FINALIZED</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/05/01/important-ssa-contract-finalized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/05/01/important-ssa-contract-finalized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
*Please see below for 2012 contract changes
 
Attention all SSA Employees:
 
On Thursday, April 26, 2012, union and management signed off on the final unresolved contract language. On Friday, April 27 union and management signed off on each article and letters of understanding.
One outstanding dispute remains and that involves Article 4 and expanded bargaining rights for the union.  The union [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div><span style="font-size: x-small; color: #ff0000; font-family: Arial;"><em>*Please see below for 2012 contract changes</em></span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Attention all SSA Employees:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>On Thursday, April 26, 2012, union and management signed off on the final unresolved contract language. On Friday, April 27 union and management signed off on each article and letters of understanding.</div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">One outstanding dispute remains and that involves Article 4 and expanded bargaining rights for the union.  The union proposed that unless a matter was specifically addressed in the contract or MOUs, it is appropriate for bargaining.  This is an </span><span style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">attempt</span><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"> to limit the Agency&#8217;s use of &#8220;covered by&#8221; arguments to avoid negotiations. The parties agreed that this single issue would be submitted to the FSIP for resolution.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">The parties also agreed that despite sending a single issue to the FSIP for decision, we would immediately initiate the ratification process.  SSA has assured us that they can produce final ratification copies of the contract within 10 days.  These copies will be sent to Locals for redistribution.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new<br />
 york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">Locals should begin to schedule their ratification processes so that they can take their ratification votes expeditiously.  Locals have until 6/26/12 to ratify the contract. Hopefully votes will be taken as expeditiously as possible.  As soon as the contract is ratified, it will go into effect despite the fact that we still have one remaining issue to resolve at FSIP.  If ratification can be concluded before the 6/26/12 deadline, the new contract can be effectuated sooner.  So, please expedite your ratification process.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">Article X, Section 3(a) of the Council 220 constitution states as follows with regard to contract ratification:</span></div>
<blockquote>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">Any nationally negotiated Master Agreement, Supplement to any Master Agreement, or mid-term bargaining agreement adding to or modifying any Master Agreement or Supplement to the Master Agreement shall be subject to ratification by a majority vote of the locals, each voting its membership.  Each local shall conduct a vote and tabulate the totals in compliance with the AFGE Constitution and the National Council Constitution.  The membership strength of the local shall be prorated between yes and no votes actually cast.  To have votes counted, the locals must respond to the Council Secretary within 60 days of receipt of the notice by the local.  The Secretary of the Council shall tabulate the prorated vote totals and notify the Executive Committee and the locals of the vote totals.  All locals must keep all voting records for a period of one year.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<p>This constitutes notice to the locals of the need to conduct a ratification vote and to report such vote no later than June 26, 2012.</p>
<div>General Committee components other than AFGE Council 220 will conduct their ratification votes according to their respective Council and Local procedures.  </p>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>The parties have agreed to expedite the scheduling of bargaining of the 4 remaining articles: Articles 21 (Appraisals), 26 (Merit Promotion), 39 (Work at Home by Exception) and Flexiplace.  Bargaining can begin before ratification is concluded.</div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">Thanks to the entire AFGE General Committee bargaining team for their excellent  work on these contract negotiations.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><br />
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">Witold Skwierczynski</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;">AFGE Chief Negotiator</span></span></p>
<p align="center"> </p>
<p align="center"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">AFGE-SSA Contract Changes 2012</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 1 Governing Laws, Regulations and Existing Conditions of employment</span></p>
<p>Agency is obligated to give advance notice on change to any Existing Past Practices/MOUs/Supplemental Agreements if not covered by 2012 National Agreement</p>
<p>Parties agree to withdraw their reopening the contract letters.  Effect is to keep MOUs negotiated from 2005 to present in place unless superseded by contract.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 3 Employees Rights</span></p>
<p>Two Personal Rights Basis were added &#8211; gender Identity and genetic Information</p>
<p>Bullying prohibited and will not be tolerated in workplace and agency to provide info on website</p>
<p>Froze old desk search policy dated 2/8/2008</p>
<p>In-office security to protect personal belongings and assistances for losses will be provided upon request</p>
<p>Memory joggers cannot be used unless reduced to writing within 1 year</p>
<p>Official records and files shall only be viewed or disseminated to management on a need to know basis</p>
<p>Inform employees timely of information that is retained on him/her.  Effect is that records can’t be used against employee if such documents are not disclosed in a timely basis.  This is replacement language for old 2000 contract language in Article 3, Sec 5 (E).</p>
<p>Incorporated the eOfficial Personnel File MOU into the agreement by reference</p>
<p>Improved language on retirement and thrift planning</p>
<p>Improved information on being released to go to Union Office or meet with union representative.</p>
<p>Right to notice on formal discussions done by electronic media.  Right to be present at such electronic formal discussions.  Right to be in studio to ask questions and make union statement re issue.  Right to participate in conference calls that are formal discussions.</p>
<p>Informed of right to union representation if discipline is planned.  Oral notice of Weingarten right at time of discussion if it may lead to discipline.</p>
<p>Last Chance agreements will not exceed two years</p>
<p>Improved information on Employees Orientation</p>
<p>Commitment to provide comprehensive elder care information</p>
<p>Compromise of agency policy with regards to Debt collection procedures.  Only MOU applies.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 4 Midterm Bargaining</span></p>
<p>In dispute:  Prong 1 test only for GC level bargaining.  Matters not explicitly and comprehensively addressed in contract can be negotiated mid-term.</p>
<p>Additional paid negotiator at all 4 levels if bargaining exceeds the contractual time limits.  Current contract reduces paid negotiators to 1 if negotiations exceed contractual time frames.</p>
<p>Level 4 bargaining begins no later than 1<sup>st</sup> Tuesday 10 days after notice if consultation not requested.  If consultation requested, bargaining begins no later than 2<sup>nd</sup> Tuesday of week after consultation ends.  Effect is to give parties another week to start negotiations.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 7 Duration</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p>4 year contract</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 8 Travel</span></p>
<p>Duty time for voucher preparation/submission</p>
<p>Provide Cell Phones to employees when traveling, if available</p>
<p>Commuting area travel reimbursement per travel regulation</p>
<p>Employees have right to select lodging on long term training but reimbursement cannot exceed authorized reimbursement rate (i.e., negotiated group travel rate at agency selected hotel)</p>
<p>Right to mid-term bargaining on E-2 solutions changes.</p>
<p>Copies of training guides and user manuals re E2 solutions to employees. Volunteers considered offering training.</p>
<p>SSA will make every effort to ensure that employees who travel will receive travel card and authorization in time to arrange transportation and lodging.</p>
<p>Cash advance will be given to 1<sup>st</sup> time travelers w/o card, those who have to pay a security deposit and those who stay in lodging where govt. cards aren’t accepted.</p>
<p>Agency will make provisions to pay for transportation and hotels for employees who won’t use credit card due to beliefs or can’t be issued card due to credit history.  SSA will consider alternative measures for advancing $$ for other expenses.  Case by case handling of advances for hardship, religious and credit denial exceptions.</p>
<p>Advance notice to employee of card deactivation.</p>
<p>Credit card can’t be used for personal expenses.</p>
<p>Info packet to employees on website re use of card.</p>
<p>Notice and bargaining re changes in government travel and card program.</p>
<p>No requirement for receipt/justification for $3 daily personal call reimbursement while in travel status.</p>
<p>Employees who exercise reasonable care for govt. documents/property will not be held responsible for loss, damage, theft while in possession or custody.  SSA policies re this compromised.</p>
<p>Employees on long term travel will be informed re types of available lodging, handicapped accessibility, public transportation availability and reimbursement rates.</p>
<p>Will pay relocation benefits if in interest of govt. for employees in temporary duty.</p>
<p>Full info to employees re relocation benefits including referral to contact person who can explain benefits and services.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 9 Health and Safety</span></p>
<p>Employees can use pseudonym on correspondence or elimination of name altogether.  This is equivalent to SSA removal of manager’s names from correspondence.</p>
<p>Safety precautions for sting operations</p>
<p>Joint health and safety inspections.  Union signs Inspection form.</p>
<p>Right to bargain office moves and renovations including floor plans.  Full bargaining on all issues involved in moves and renovations.  Mandatory bargaining on non-security window coverings.</p>
<p>Discussions on reducing stress at local level.  Local rep and manager meet at least once a year to try to identify causes of stress in worksite and ways to reduce stress.</p>
<p>Stronger language to ban disruptive visitors</p>
<p>Sting protections</p>
<p>Eyeglasses increased from $175 to $200 and Exams increased from $50 to $65</p>
<p>Commitment to accurate reporting of incidents.</p>
<p>Incident/accident figures twice year to Union.</p>
<p>Health and safety committees will be established in stand-alone TSCs with 200 or more employees.</p>
<p>Employee reports of unsafe conditions will be discussed by union and management.</p>
<p>Union will be invited on inspections after disasters if potential damage to facility.  SSA will inform union of actions taken when facility reopened after disaster.</p>
<p>Union will be informed of product/material recalls such as headsets, chemicals, etc.</p>
<p>MSDS to union upon request</p>
<p>Copies of abatement plans to union.</p>
<p>Tissues and hand sanitizers on all interviewing desks and work stations.</p>
<p>Evacuation chairs will be provided.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Timely</span> notice to H &amp; S rep/committee re dangerous, unhealthy or potentially dangerous/unhealthy condition at the worksite.</p>
<p>Agency will periodically test duress alarms.</p>
<p>Notice will be displayed when asbestos abatement is being done.</p>
<p>SSA will take appropriate action when threats received by phone/VIP.</p>
<p>Incidents of threats/potential threats affecting security and safety of employees, visitors, facilities and records will be reported.</p>
<p>SSA will document disruptive conduct by visitors.</p>
<p>Annual notice to employees of Identity Protection Program.</p>
<p>Employees will be notified re the number of participants in IPP.</p>
<p>Shelter in place MOU incorporated.</p>
<p>Stress reduction info to employees.</p>
<p>Reopener on smoking if change in govt. wide regs., Executive Order, laws.</p>
<p>Non employees can be expelled from office if they engage in workplace violence or threats.</p>
<p>SSA will provide employees info on weight management and control, dental health, respiratory and cardiac health.</p>
<p>Wellness coordinators will be listed on website.</p>
<p>Ergonomic furniture will be addressed in forums.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 10 Hours of Work</span></p>
<p>Up to 3 credit hours per day can be earned if established flex bands permit</p>
<p>15 minutes added to flex band in small Field offices</p>
<p>In facilities with fixed shifts, employees can work pre-shift credit hours at FOs and TSCs</p>
<p>5-4-9 entitlement for 4<sup>th</sup> shift mega TSC employees.</p>
<p>10 minute breaks for those who work at least 2 hours of post shift credit hrs.</p>
<p>Restrictions on flextime adjustments for training/staff meetings loosened.  If event can be viewed on video later, no restriction on flextime.</p>
<p>Headquarters fixed shift employees get to work up to 1 credit hour.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 11 Facilities</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Savings clause on all space.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">No limit on number of union officials who can replace space user.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">System for consideration of providing space if replacement union official is out of commute area.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Space preserved for Council Presidents if they retire or are replaced.</span></p>
<p>Union gets 5000 copies of Contract</p>
<p>Ability to send one email per month to all employees within a Council.  More possible on request.</p>
<p>Annual paper notice on how to locate National Agreement online</p>
<p>Right to private space for confidential discussions between BU member and union.</p>
<p>Space provided for membership drives.</p>
<p>Union can use DVD equipment for orientations, etc.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 12 Recycling and Going Green</span></p>
<p>Agency made contractual commitment to going green</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 13 Parking and Transportation</span></p>
<p>Transit subsidy $125 for capital region and rest of country will be $75 (2013), $80 (2014-2015) and $ 90 (2016)</p>
<p>Ability to discuss and possibly resolve outstanding parking issues.  90 day period for local consultation on parking problems.  If not resolved, agenda item for UM meeting.</p>
<p>Mandatory bargaining re parking changes in office moves or new office.</p>
<p>Info re commuting options to new employees.</p>
<p>Explore options for bicycle security and storage, if expressed by employees.  (i.e., racks or inside storage)</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 15 Contracting Out</span></p>
<p>SSA will brief Union re insourcing initiatives.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 16 Training</span></p>
<p>IDP information will be available on website.</p>
<p>IDP info to employees in 1<sup>st</sup> quarter every year.</p>
<p>Questions arising from IVT training will be answered timely.</p>
<p>Up to 40 hours of administrative time during contract period/16 max per year for licensure/certification requirement.</p>
<p>SSA sponsored training and educational programs on website.</p>
<p>Management insures that questions that employees have as a result of an IVT broadcast will be answered timely.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 17 &#8211; Awards</span></p>
<p>2011 MOU – Program match.  Guaranteed ROCs based on overall appraisal ratings of 4.0, 4.5 and 5.0.</p>
<p>Award ranges based on overall appraisal ratings.  Grade irrelevant re award ranges.</p>
<p>Briefing to Union if SSA ignores OPM recommended awards budget.</p>
<p>No suggestion award program.  If SSA decides to begin new suggestion awards program, notice and bargaining opportunity to union.</p>
<p>Expanded awards info.  Re position, duty station, and organization of each employee.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 18 Equal Employment Opportunity</span></p>
<p>Added gender identity and genetic information as basis for discrimination</p>
<p>Reasonable amount of time will be allowed per Statute and 8/24/8 will not be arbitrary. More time for difficult cases and no arbitrary cut off of time.  Any denial will be in writing, if requested.  8-24-8 is a guideline.</p>
<p>Duty time for travel of a personal representative to an EEO event.  Would not include travel just to meet with the employee.  Would include representing the employee at an event (hearing, deposition, investigation, ADR).</p>
<p>Information regarding filing a request for reasonable accommodation to employees.  Employee ability to file such request orally or in writing.</p>
<p>Employees informed of management official who will engage with the employee in an interactive manner re reasonable accommodation requests.</p>
<p>Article 19 Upward Mobility</p>
<p>Commitment to establish programs with local institutions or others, and online training sources, to increase opportunity for employees to engage in continuing education.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 20 Child and Elder care</span></p>
<p>Elder care added to title and content</p>
<p>Pay for 1 AFGE rep to attend annual GSA Child Care Conference</p>
<p>Private space and duty time for lactation</p>
<p>Emergency leave for child care/elder care problems must be granted absent a work emergency.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 23 Disciplinary and Adverse Actions</span></p>
<p>Added a new section on Investigations with Union’s right to be present.</p>
<p>Oral presentation face to face if co-located otherwise consideration given to employee preference.</p>
<p>Contractual language for deciding official to be higher level in mgmt. chain than proposing official.</p>
<p>Right to information in addition to that relied upon to support proposal.  Intent is that union can request and obtain exculpatory material (i.e., evidence exonerating the disciplined employee).</p>
<p>Quarterly sanitized notice of reprimands and proposed disciplinary actions.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 24 Grievance Procedures</span></p>
<p>Clarified ability to file group grievance with 25% of grievants selected by union to be present at grievance meetings.</p>
<p>Management requirement it communicate with representative in step 1, 2 and 3 of the grievance procedure if they feel that the grievance lacks sufficient information regarding identification of specific contract violation(s).  Such communication required or SSA can’t use arbitrability defense re not understanding basis of grievance.</p>
<p>Parties can use ADR to resolve grievances by mutual consent.  Procedures in Article 40.</p>
<p>Proof of service for filing grievances includes certified mail return receipt by Post Office or commercial delivery service and signed written acknowledgement by recipient of grievance.</p>
<p>Grievances require original signature and proof of service.</p>
<p>Grievance decision can be issued by e-mail.</p>
<p>Can advance grievances after initial filing by e-mail.</p>
<p>Must request oral presentation when grievance is advanced or oral presentation is waived.</p>
<p>Grievance by e-mail considered received the 1<sup>st</sup> day after the day of transmission.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 25 Arbitration</span></p>
<p>Both parties exchanges witness lists within 15 days prior to hearing.</p>
<p>Increase in arbitrator fees: $500 for an expedited case, $1000/day for a regular case.  Fees the same for all panels.</p>
<p>Parties will try to define the issues 15 work days prior to hearing.</p>
<p>October removal of arbitrators effectuated by written notice to the opposite party any time between 10/1 and 10/31 and subsequent joint notice to arbitrator.</p>
<p>Removed arbitrator can only hear cases scheduled within 120 days of notice of removal.  Other cases assigned removed arbitrator must be sent to panel for re-picking of arbitrator.  If an arbitrator has been removed in October, panel must reassign cases by 12/1.</p>
<p>Either party can remove a maximum of 5 arbitrators at any time – with a maximum of 1 per panel.  Rules for remaining cases assigned to arbitrator same as for October removals.</p>
<p>If arbitrator mutually removed at any time, same rules as for other removals.</p>
<p>If removed arbitrator declines to hear remaining scheduled cases, the cases are assigned to panel for re-picking arbitrators.</p>
<p>Parties need to rewrite refusal to participate language which will include procedures for sunset declarations.</p>
<p>Cases will sunset 2 ½ years after arbitrator selection.  Exceptions language to 2 ½ year sunset (e.g., death of arbitrator, illness of arbitrator, weather postponement, issues affecting reps and witnesses, deaths in family, emergencies etc.) yet to be written.</p>
<p>When arbitrator selected, each party will identify representative.  If representative changes must notify other party and arbitrator.  All correspondence/communication will be addressed to whoever has been named rep.</p>
<p>Each party entitled to 1 TA and 1 observer.  (Current language only applies to union.)</p>
<p>Witnesses paid travel and per diem must be SSA employees except for retired GC contract experts.</p>
<p>Penalties for arbitrators who issue late decisions: if no decision within 45 days 20% penalty and if no decision within 90 days, 40% penalty.</p>
<p>In expedited cases, if no decision within 15 days, 20% penalty.  If no decision within 30 days, 40% penalty.</p>
<p>Expedited arbitration hearing must be scheduled no more than 60 days after notice to arbitrator of selection.</p>
<p>No time requirement for hearing regular cases.</p>
<p>Procedures established for picking arbitrators when panels are depleted and there are less than ½ of arbitrators left on panel.</p>
<p>E-mail can be used to invoke arbitration.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 27 Details</span></p>
<p>No cost hardship details provision.</p>
<p>Hardship Reassignment MOU continues in place as past practice per Article 1, Section 3.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 28 Classification</span></p>
<p>SSA will timely apply OPM classification and job grading standards.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 29 Committees</span></p>
<p>Quarterly regional DCO meetings by technology</p>
<p>Monthly GC meetings with Deputies</p>
<p>Monthly component meetings with Deputies</p>
<p>2 of 6 yearly Union-OLMER meetings will be done through technology.</p>
<p>If Forums Executive Order stays in place, MOU provisions and subsequent Forum decisions re GC level meetings, component level meetings, regional level meetings and local pre-decisional involvement mechanisms will continue in place of Article 29 meetings with Deputies.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 30 Official Time</span></p>
<p>Official time requests approved by end of day, if possible.</p>
<p>If time denied for work reasons, must be granted in 2 work days.</p>
<p>Eliminated percentage structure and added fifteen 1440 hour reps.</p>
<p>Keep present number of 100% ers and 1040 hour employees.</p>
<p>Time excluded from official time: FLRA related time, time for mid-term bargaining and time for term bargaining.  Forums time exclude in Forums MOU.</p>
<p>EEO time will be as personal rep and, therefore, in addition to hour caps.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 31 Leave</span></p>
<p>If management demands medical certificate due to suspected abuse of sick leave request, management must document in writing basis for their suspicion of abuse.</p>
<p>Elimination of “declared state of emergency” language required to grant more than 2 hours of administrative leave for emergencies (e.g., hazardous weather).</p>
<p>Individual PSC Locals can elect to have a seniority roster for first 2 years of contract.  Consultation will occur re what system to use in last 2 years.</p>
<p>Union will be provided SCD dates of employees when rosters established.</p>
<p>Union-management will meet and mutually revise Q’s and A’s re rosters.</p>
<p>SSA will consider participation in establishing leave transfer program for SSA employees when OPM establishes such a program in response to emergencies and major disasters.</p>
<p>When employee establishes a return to duty date while off work due to emergency/illness, no requirement to contact SSA daily.</p>
<p>Restricted disclosure of medical documents.</p>
<p>No sick leave restriction can be imposed solely due to leave balance.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 33 Temporary, Probationary, Part Time Permanent and Seasonal Employees</span></p>
<p>3 on 3 subgroup to update job sharing language.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 34 Employee Disability Compensation</span></p>
<p>Workers Compensation (WC) counseling for employees with job related illness/injury will occur no later than next workday or as soon as practicable (if employee can’t communicate).</p>
<p>SSA will counsel employees on how to access WC forms to file claims.</p>
<p>SSA will assist employees in completing WC forms upon request.</p>
<p>SSA will fulfill all WC related responsibilities in a timely manner.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 37 Tests and Employee Selection Process</span></p>
<p>SSA will provide the Union a list of tests used as a selection criteria for training/career development program or for internal placement.  Such list will be provided within 120 days of effective date of contract.</p>
<p>SSA will grant employees duty time to take tests for internal promotion/placement. (Current contract stated that SSA would “ordinarily” grant the time.</p>
<p>SSA will conduct 2 meetings (in Falls Church and Baltimore) within 60 days of the effective date of the contract 2 discuss with the union the benchmarking/certification process for Paralegal Specialists in ODAR and for the Program Law Attorney position in OGC. </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 38 Multilingual/Bilingual Employees</span></p>
<p>Mentors for multilingual/bilingual employees should be highly motivated, knowledgeable employees with good multilingual/bilingual skills.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 40 Alternative Dispute Resolution</span></p>
<p>ADR referral is by mutual agreement.</p>
<p>If non-represented employee participates in ADR, Union has a right to be present during the process.</p>
<p>Each party pays costs for their representatives.  SSA pays costs for the employee.</p>
<p>No cost mediators will be sought to conduct the ADR.  Selections will be joint.</p>
<p>ADR is available at all steps of the grievance procedure.  If used for grievance, grievance time limits are suspended.</p>
<p>4 hour limit for ADR.  Can be extended by mutual consent.</p>
<p>If mediator would cost money (e.g., travel expenses) mediation will be through technology.</p>
<p>Evaluations will be completed by both parties after mediation concluded.  Evaluations will be shared with opposing party.</p>
<p>If no resolution, documents created in ADR mediation will be destroyed.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 50 Communications</span></p>
<p>This article is really the TSC article.</p>
<p>AFGE withdrew this article without prejudice.  SSA agrees that it will be a mandatory Forums agenda item. </p>
<p>As a Forums agenda item, the Forums MOU provides for the establishment of a workgroup which will report to the Forums regarding TSC issues.</p>
<p>Issues that were in Article 50 and are now part of a mandatory Forums agenda item are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Telephone policies such as Wrap Up, Hold and Sign Off.  Also, abusive calls, documenting “tone” of employee communications, claimant discourtesy and abusive language and use of CHIP and Phone Pro.</li>
<li>Use of Automatic Call Distributer Equipment (ACD).  This includes use of ACD to track breaks, lunches, absences, plug in time etc. Also, included are issues concerning interruption of calls, instant messaging, and pop up messages.  Also, included is the issue of providing voice mail to individual TSRs.</li>
<li>Personal telephone messages to employees and messages from employees to others.</li>
<li>Technical reading time scheduling and duration.</li>
<li>Inter and Intra component details and developmental opportunities.</li>
<li>Service Observation.</li>
<li>Although not included in Article 50, I would expect TSC leave practices to also be part of the Forum issues.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 51 Workgroups</span></p>
<p>The issue of focus groups was part of this article. </p>
<p>SSA agreed to consult with AFGE on numbers of participants, who the participants are, topics discussed, etc. if SSA uses focus groups.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 21 Appraisals, Article 26 Merit Promotion, Article 39 Work at Home by Exception, Article 42 Telework</span></p>
<p>Unresolved.  After contract ratification, will be negotiated separately. </p>
<p>2 teams of negotiators will be selected.  SSA will pay for 5 travelers for each negotiation.  The Union can finance additional negotiators at its option.</p>
<p>Each negotiation will be for 2 weeks.</p>
<p>1 negotiating team will negotiate Work at Home by Exception and Telework</p>
<p>2<sup>nd</sup> team will negotiate Appraisals and Merit Promotion.</p>
<p>Each unresolved negotiations can be referred separately to FSIP for resolution if necessary.</p>
<p>Although agreement specifies negotiations will begin no later than June 1, ratification will not be concluded by that date.  Parties have understanding that dates will likely be delayed.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Additional Issues </span></p>
<p>Space improvement in Chicago for OQP Council.  Involves construction of a wall.</p>
<p>Union will inventory furnishings and equipment in regional GC space and consult with SSA re improvements.</p>
<p>4 on 4 workgroup to write conceptual agreements established.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/05/01/important-ssa-contract-finalized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds Would Pay 5% More for Retirement Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/feds-would-pay-5-more-for-retirement-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/feds-would-pay-5-more-for-retirement-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Fedsmith.com
By: Ian Smith
April 25, 2012
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday approved legislation that would require federal employees to have to pay 5 percent more of their salaries towards their retirement benefits beginning in 2013 and phased in over five years.
Current federal workers would pay 1.5 percent more next year, an additional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: Fedsmith.com</p>
<p>By: Ian Smith</p>
<p>April 25, 2012</p>
<p>The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday approved legislation that would require federal employees to have to pay 5 percent more of their salaries towards their retirement benefits beginning in 2013 and phased in over five years.</p>
<p>Current federal workers would pay 1.5 percent more next year, an additional 0.5 percent in 2014 and then another 1 percent per year from 2015-2017.</p>
<p>New hires would see the full 5 percent increase starting in 2013 if they have less than five years of prior federal service.</p>
<p>Members of Congress and their staff members would not be exempt from the legislation either should it ultimately pass. Members of Congress would have to contribute an additional 8.5 percent from their salaries, and Congressional staffers under CSRS would pay 8.5 percent while staffers under FERS would be required to contribute an additional 7.5 percent.</p>
<p>Speaking on the legislation, committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) said, &#8220;Like Social Security, the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund is not a store of wealth, it’s a line on the Treasury’s ledger. If the federal government’s out of control spending is not curbed, these accounts will prove just how empty they really are — we need to secure these earned employee benefits and reduce the deficit at the same time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Federal union leaders had sent letters in advance of the committee review protesting the legislation, and some Democratic House members were unsatisfied with the legislation during the review as well. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) called it an &#8220;effective pay cut&#8221; for federal workers and Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA) said the proposed legislation was &#8220;odious to federal workers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The legislation is not the first such proposal to come from the House that takes aim at federal pay and benefits. Paul Ryan&#8217;s (R-WI) budget proposal contained <a href="http://www.fedsmith.com/article/3352/ryan-budget-blueprint-raises-pension-contributions.html">increased pension contributions</a> and an <a href="http://www.fedsmith.com/article/3351/gop-budget-proposal-would-freeze-federal.html">extended pay freeze</a>, and the Republican Study Committee released a budget blueprint that contained <a href="http://www.fedsmith.com/article/3358/rsc-budget-would-increase-pension-contributions.html">increased pension contributions</a> as well.</p>
<p><!-- bottom link ad unit -->&nbsp;</p>
<p><!-- End Quantcast tag --><!-- Disqus --><!-- Google PlusOne --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/feds-would-pay-5-more-for-retirement-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSPB Win</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/mspb-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/mspb-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Claims Representative in SSA’s Elgin, Illinois Office Has His Job Back Thanks to a Cooperative Effort Between AFGE, Local 1923 and Local 1395
After receiving successful performance ratings for several years, a new first-level supervisor determined that the Employee’s performance was not successful and placed him on a performance assistance plan and then an opportunity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>A Claims Representative in SSA’s Elgin, Illinois Office Has His Job Back Thanks to a Cooperative Effort Between </strong><strong>AFGE, Local 1923 and Local 1395</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">After receiving successful performance ratings for several years, a new first-level supervisor determined that the Employee’s performance was not successful and placed him on a performance assistance plan and then an opportunity to perform successfully plan. Then she fired him. Neither the agency’s proposal nor the decision letter identified, to the maximum extent feasible, the critical elements in which the Employee was supposedly failing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Administrative Law Judge Gay Chase wrote: “In appeals involving performance-based actions an agency must prove by substantial evidence that: (1) it took its action under a performance appraisal system approved by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM); (2) the performance standards were valid; (3) the appellant&#8217;s performance in at least one critical element was deficient as charged; and (4) it provided the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance prior to effecting the removal action. Kadlec v. Department of the Army, 49 M.S.P.R. 534, 539 (1991). “Substantial evidence” is that degree of relevant evidence that a reasonable person, considering the record as a whole, might accept as adequate to support a conclusion even though other reasonable persons might disagree.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Judge Chase found that although the Employee “was informed generally of what he needed to do to improve his performance overall . . . the elements, standards and expectations were not set out separately to identify under each element and standard what the appellant needed to do specifically to improve his performance. Further, the PA and OPS documentation failed to provide examples of the appellant’s deficient work by element and standard.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">As a result the judge concluded that “the agency failed to communicate to the appellant the standards he had to meet in order to be evaluated at a performance level sufficient for retention. In such situations, the Board will not determine whether the appellant’s performance was at the acceptable level for the critical elements at issue, and the agency’s action must be reversed.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">After a two-day hearing the judge vacated the removal action and ordered the agency to reinstate the Employee with full back pay, credits and benefits.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">The Employee was initially represented by Local 1395 union representative Dennis Clamors. Local 1923 Associate General Counsel James W. Richard, II, successfully litigated the matter before the MSPB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/30/mspb-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Action! Contact Your Senators and Representative!</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/09/take-action-contact-your-senators-and-representative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/09/take-action-contact-your-senators-and-representative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell Them:
 
On behalf of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, which represents 650,000 federal workers in 65 agencies throughout the nation, I am urging you to oppose the amendment authored by Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) which would implement energy drilling projects by extending the current two-year federal employee pay freeze by an additional year.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Tell Them:</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>On behalf of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, which represents 650,000 federal workers in 65 agencies throughout the nation, I am urging you to oppose the amendment authored by Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) which would implement energy drilling projects by extending the current two-year federal employee pay freeze by an additional year.  A vote on this amendment is expected Tuesday.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Federal Employees Have Already Sacrificed</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Far too many Senators appear to believe that all federal employees earn at least $100,000 annually, but sixty percent of the federal workforce is paid the equivalent of a GS-9 or below (starting salary $47,448). Since 2011, federal employees have given up $60 billion (over 10 years) from the unprecedented two-year pay freeze, and the UI bill’s 2.3% increase in retirement contributions for post-2012 hires saves another $15 billion. That’s a total of $75 billion. If the Roberts’ amendment is enacted, that will bring the total contribution by federal employees to $105 billion.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Yet, millionaires/billionaires, corporations, agribusiness subsidies, federal contractors, and hundreds of other legitimate targets, haven&#8217;t given up a nickel.  It’s not “shared sacrifice” if no one else is sharing in the pain. <br />
 <br />
Impact of the Third Year of the Pay Freeze on Middle Income Federal Employees<br />
 <br />
Attached is a chart which shows the economic impact of the current pay freeze on middle income federal workers and the impact if the freeze is extended for a third year. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>• Already, a GS-5 meat and poultry inspector earning $31,315 has given up $1,265 in lost salary increases from the two-year freeze.  If the freeze continues for a third year, the inspector will have lost $3,842.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>• A GS-7 federal penitentiary correctional officer earning $38,790 while guarding ruthless gang leaders in dangerously understaffed institutions has given up $1,567 from the two-year freeze.  If the freeze continues for a third year, the correctional officer will have lost $4,759.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Unemployment Insurance Extension</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Last month, federal employees were forced to pay for 50% of the cost of the Unemployment Insurance extension.  The following will help explain how harsh those changes will be for new, middle-grade employees, like the ones we represent: <br />
 <br />
For a GS-3 nursing assistant earning $27,322 while working in a VA hospital psychiatric ward, this will be a $628 annual tax increase.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For a GS-5 USDA meat and poultry inspector earning $31,825 while protecting Americans from E. Coli and other deadly diseases caused by contaminated meat, this will be a $732 annual tax increase.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For a GS-7 federal penitentiary correctional officer earning $38,790 while guarding ruthless gang leaders in dangerously understaffed institutions, this will be an $893 annual tax increase.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Who Federal Employees Are</div>
<div> </div>
<div>America’s patriotic federal employees serve as Border Patrol agents, as nurses and doctors in VA hospitals, as mechanics at military installations, as scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control, as correctional officers, as meat and poultry inspectors, and in hundreds of other occupations. Their commitment to their communities – and the Americans they serve – is unparalleled. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>It is fundamentally wrong for federal employees to be required, again, to serve as the Automated Teller Machine for programs having nothing to do with deficit reduction. Moreover, for the purposes of deficit reduction, they have sacrificed more than anyone else, by far.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Enough is enough.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Please vote against the Roberts amendment which pays for drilling projects by freezing – for the third year in a row – the salaries of federal employees.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/04/09/take-action-contact-your-senators-and-representative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitrator Rescinds a 30-day Suspension!  SSA Failed to Prove, by Preponderant Evidence, the Charges Levied Against a Claims Representative.</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Another win for AFGE Local 1923 and Staff Attorney James W. Richard, II.   Arbitration was invoked after filing a grievance challenging management’s decision at a Social Security field office to suspend a Claims Representative for 30 days for alleged inappropriate behavior to a member of the public, failure to follow establish policies and procedures, failure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Another win for AFGE Local 1923 and Staff Attorney James W. Richard, II.   Arbitration was invoked after filing a grievance challenging management’s decision at a Social Security field office to suspend a Claims Representative for 30 days for alleged inappropriate behavior to a member of the public, failure to follow establish policies and procedures, failure to follow management directives, and misrepresentation of facts in response to a managements inquiry, which occurred in April 2009.  The union successfully argued and the arbitrator agreed that the agency failed to prove the charges levied against the Grievant.  The arbitrator awarded full back pay (which included interest, contributions and leave restoration) for the 30 days the Grievant was penalized, all mention of disciplinary action removed from her file, and attorney fees.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitrator Rescinds a 30-day Suspension! SSA Failed to Prove, by Preponderant Evidence, the Charges Levied Against a Claims Representative</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another win for AFGE Local 1923 and Staff Attorney James W. Richard, II. Arbitration was invoked after filing a grievance challenging management’s decision at a Social Security field office to suspend a Claims Representative for 30 days for alleged inappropriate behavior to a member of the public, failure to follow establish policies and procedures, failure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another win for AFGE Local 1923 and Staff Attorney James W. Richard, II. Arbitration was invoked after filing a grievance challenging management’s decision at a Social Security field office to suspend a Claims Representative for 30 days for alleged inappropriate behavior to a member of the public, failure to follow establish policies and procedures, failure to follow management directives, and misrepresentation of facts in response to a managements inquiry, which occurred in April 2009. The union successfully argued and the arbitrator agreed that the agency failed to prove the charges levied against the Grievant. The arbitrator awarded full back pay (which included interest, contributions and leave restoration) for the 30 days the Grievant was penalized, all mention of disciplinary action removed from her file, and attorney fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/19/arbitrator-rescinds-a-30-day-suspension-ssa-failed-to-prove-by-preponderant-evidence-the-charges-levied-against-a-claims-representative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union, Social Security Administration reach contract deal</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/07/union-social-security-administration-reach-contract-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/07/union-social-security-administration-reach-contract-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Amanda Palleschi
March 1, 2012
Source: Govexec.com
 
This story has been updated with comment.
 
Social Security Administration employees nationwide achieved some gains in working conditions and benefits in a contract agreement reached Wednesday, after more than two years of negotiations.
 
The contract agreement between SSA and the American Federation of Government Employees Union is currently a “conceptual,” oral agreement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="byline">By Amanda Palleschi</div>
<div id="timestamp">March 1, 2012</div>
<div>Source: Govexec.com</div>
<div> </div>
<div><em><strong>This story has been updated with comment.</strong></em></div>
<div><strong><em></em></strong> </div>
<div>Social Security Administration employees nationwide achieved some gains in working conditions and benefits in a contract agreement reached Wednesday, after more than two years of negotiations.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The contract agreement between SSA and the American Federation of Government Employees Union is currently a “conceptual,” oral agreement between the two parties, but the union expects to have a contract signed with the agency by mid-April, said Witold Skwierczynski, an AFGE representative. Once a contract is ratified, it will be valid for four years.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The agreement has been in the works since December 2009, according to a statement issued Thursday by the union.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Negotiations between the two groups have taken place two weeks every month since that time. In September 2011, AFGE took the bargaining to the Federal Service Impasses Panel.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>“When the agency saw we were prepared to go to the impasses panel, they started changing their attitude with regards to contract negotiations,” Skwierczynski told <em>Government Executive</em>. “We were convinced they’d be happy to just roll over our current contracts for another four years.”</div>
<div> </div>
<div>According to Skwierczynski, the union “took a lot of hits” on a number of issues in its prior contract, signed in 2005.</div>
<div>If the agreement reached Wednesday is inked as a formal contract next month, employees will see an increase in employer contributions to some vision benefits, a rise in transit subsidies and more in credit hours for student employees, he said.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Under the new agreement, SSA managers will be required to inform an employee that he or she has a right to a union representative during discussions of potential disciplinary action against the employee. In the past, managers were not inquired to inform the employee of their rights, Skwierczynski said.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Additionally, the new agreement expands employee “personal rights” &#8212; including gender identity in the agency’s discrimination policy, a new anti-bullying provision and a lactation policy for breastfeeding mothers.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Many other items AFGE hoped to gain in the new agreement have been deferred, the union said, including provisions regarding electronic meetings and telework.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>“Those are sticky positions where the parties are pretty opposite,” Skwierczynski said, calling SSA’s telework policy “extremely restrictive.’ The union is requesting a telework policy that allows employees to work at home two to four days a week.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>SSA confirmed the conceptual agreement in a statement Thursday and said it expects to meet with AFGE again early next month.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The agency is aiming to recoup its losses in funding and employee levels from fiscal 2011 budget cuts in this year’s budget.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>In the Obama administration’s <a title="http://www.ssa.gov/budget/2013BudgetOverview.pdf" href="http://www.ssa.gov/budget/2013BudgetOverview.pdf" target="_blank">fiscal 2013 budget proposal</a>, SSA requests $11.9 billion &#8212; nearly $30 million above fiscal 2012 budget.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The agency plans to begin replacing 7,000 state and federal employees it lost since a hiring freeze from 2011.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/03/07/union-social-security-administration-reach-contract-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFGE Letter to House Opposing Payroll Tax Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/27/afge-letter-to-house-opposing-payroll-tax-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/27/afge-letter-to-house-opposing-payroll-tax-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 16, 2012
Dear Representative:

On behalf of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, which represents 650,000 federal workers throughout the nation, I am writing to urge you to vote against the Payroll Tax Holiday/Unemployment Insurance extension conference report that pays for the latter by taxing the working and middle class Americans whomake up the federal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>February 16, 2012</p>
<p>Dear Representative:</p></div>
<div>
On behalf of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, which represents 650,000 federal workers throughout the nation, I am writing to urge you to vote against the Payroll Tax Holiday/Unemployment Insurance extension conference report that pays for the latter by taxing the working and middle class Americans whomake up the federal workforce. Forcing new federal employees (hired after 2012) to pay an additional 2.3 percent of their incomes to cover the cost of lengthening the period of eligibility for Unemployment Insurance is not a compromise and it is not a form<br />
of shared sacrifice.</div>
<div>
For a GS-3 nursing assistant earning $27,322 while working in a VA hospital psychiatric ward, this will be a $628 annual tax increase. For a GS-5 USDA meat and poultry inspector earning $31,825 while protecting Americans from E. Coli and other deadly diseases caused by contaminated meat, this will be a $732 annual tax increase. For a<br />
GS-7 federal penitentiary correctional officer earning $38,790 while guarding ruthless gang leaders in dangerously understaffed institutions, this will be an $893 annual tax increase. In short, this &#8220;deal&#8221; is an outrageous injustice that deserves the vociferous<br />
opposition of every Member of Congress with a conscience.</div>
<div>
Please note the following:</div>
<div>
• The extension of unemployment insurance is temporary, but the additional 2.3 percent tax on new federal employees in this bill would be permanent.</div>
<div>
• The 2.3 percent tax on new federal employees will go to a retirement trust fund that is already fully funded; it is not to address any kind of shortfall in federal<br />
retirement financing.</div>
<div>
• According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics&#8217; data on private sector defined benefit plans, 96 percent of employers require no funding contribution from their employees, but this plan would force new federal employees to pay 3.1 percent<br />
of their incomes for this modest benefit.</div>
<div>
This plan is entirely unfair, unnecessary, and undeserved.</div>
<div>
There is simply no legitimate rationale for imposing this tax on federal employees.</div>
<div>
Federal employees are extremely sympathetic to the dire situation of the long-term unemployed. We strongly support the extension of unemployment benefits, but we absolutely oppose placing a full 50 percent of its cost on federal employees, and forcing them to pay these insupportable rates in perpetuity.</div>
<div>
If there must be offsets to counter the cost of extending unemployment insurance, let them come from a group that has not already given $60 billion toward deficit reduction in the form of a two-year pay freeze, and is slated to give $28 billion more from the plan to withhold salary adjustments in the future. The millionaires and billionaires who have continued to profit during this economic recession haven&#8217;t been asked to pay one nickel more in taxes. Americans continue to pay massive subsidies to oil companies as well as bail out the banks that started this recession with their shady lending practices that caused millions of Americans to lose their jobs, their homes, and their savings.</div>
<div>
Please stand up to this shameful maneuver and vote to oppose the conference report.</div>
<div>
Sincerely yours,</div>
<div>
Beth Moten<br />
Legislative and Political Director</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/27/afge-letter-to-house-opposing-payroll-tax-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIGHT BACK AGINST THE WAR ON YOUR PENSION AND PAY!</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/fight-back-aginst-the-war-on-your-pension-and-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/fight-back-aginst-the-war-on-your-pension-and-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calls to your lawmakers should be made on your personal cell phone or home phone. Do not use a government phone to make this call. Calls can be made at the worksite if you are off duty and not in a public work area. Do not distribute this document over government email or using government [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calls to your lawmakers should be made on your personal cell phone or home phone. Do not use a government phone to make this call. Calls can be made at the worksite if you are off duty and not in a public work area. Do not distribute this document over government email or using government resources.</strong></p>
<p> The size of your paycheck, what you pay for your pension and what you get when you retire are all on the line.</p>
<p>Instead of asking the very rich and Wall Street to pay their fair share, right wing House Leaders are stealing the pay and pensions of federal employees to pay for anything and everything – from paying for the Highway Bill to extending the Social Security Tax holiday and unemployment benefits. They’ll keep doing it until we put enough pressure on them to end this outrage.</p>
<p><strong>Please call your Representative toll free at: 1-888-907-8362.</strong>  When the receptionist answers, you can leave a message like this:</p>
<p> <strong>“My name is ___________(give your first and last name) and I’m a voter in the Representative’s district.  I’m calling to urge ______________(your Representative’s name) to oppose any proposal that touches the pay or pensions of middle income federal employees.  We’ve sacrificed over $60 billion towards deficit reduction.  It’s time for Congress to protect the middle class, not Wall Street and the very rich. Thank you</strong></p>
<p>Calling your lawmaker only takes a few minutes and it’s time well spent. Collectively, we can make sure that Congress’ phones are ringing off the hook.  That’s the way you get them to pay attention to our concerns. Thank you for taking action!</p>
<p> <strong>American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/fight-back-aginst-the-war-on-your-pension-and-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President&#8217;s budget makes pay raise proposal official</title>
		<link>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/presidents-budget-makes-pay-raise-proposal-official/</link>
		<comments>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/presidents-budget-makes-pay-raise-proposal-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News You Can Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afgelocal1923.org/?p=1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Kellie Lunney 
February 13, 2012 
Source: Govexec.com 


 
President Obama has proposed a 0.5 percent pay raise for federal workers in 2013, ending a two-year civilian pay freeze that began in 2011.


The White House’s fiscal 2013 budget request, however, also includes a proposal to increase the amount federal employees contribute to their government pensions by a total [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>By <a href="http://www.govexec.com/voices/kellie-lunney/2348/"><span style="color: #1e6caa;">Kellie Lunney </span></a></div>
<div><span style="color: #8f8f8f;">February 13, 2012</span> </div>
<div><span style="color: #8f8f8f;">Source: Govexec.com</span> </div>
<div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>President Obama has proposed a 0.5 percent pay raise for federal workers in 2013, ending a two-year civilian pay freeze that began in 2011.</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>The White House’s fiscal 2013 budget request, however, also includes a proposal to increase the amount federal employees contribute to their government pensions by a total of 1.2 percent over three years beginning in 2013. The administration estimates the increase would save the government $27 billion over the next decade; officials estimate the current two-year pay freeze will save $60 billion over 10 years.</p>
<p>Neither proposal comes as a big surprise. In January, <em>The Washington Post</em> reported the administration would <a href="http://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2012/01/white-house-to-propose-05-percent-pay-increase/35778/"><span style="color: #1e6caa;">propose a 0.5 percent pay raise</span></a> in its budget, and the White House has said it opposes legislative efforts to extend the current salary freeze.</p>
<p>In September 2011, Obama released a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/jointcommitteereport.pdf"><span style="color: #1e6caa;">deficit reduction proposal</span></a> that recommended increasing the amount federal employees contribute to their pensions over three years at a rate of 0.4 percent annually beginning in 2013. “While federal agency contributions for currently accruing costs of employee pensions would decline, these employers would pay an additional amount toward unfunded liabilities of the retirement system that would leave total agency contributions unchanged over the 10-year budget window,” the plan stated.</p>
<p>At the time, Obama called the changes “modest adjustments to federal retirement programs.”</p>
<p>In addition, the president&#8217;s fiscal 2013 budget would eliminate the Federal Employees Retirement System Annuity Supplement for new employees. That recommendation also was in the September deficit reduction plan.</p>
<p>“Overall, these changes are not expected to have a negative impact on the administration’s ability to manage its human resources, nor inhibit the government’s ability to serve the American people,” the budget document stated.</p>
<p>The president also is recommending the creation of a Commission on Federal Public Service Reform to look at ways to modernize federal personnel practices in areas including compensation, performance and mobility.</p>
<p>Federal employee unions praised the Obama administration’s support for ending the pay freeze, but were not pleased about the recommendation to increase the amount workers chip in for their pensions. “We are disappointed that the administration is asking federal employees to once again shoulder the burden of our deficits by increasing their pension contributions with no corresponding increase in the benefit,” said Matt Biggs, legislative and political director at the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers.</p>
<p>“This attack on federal retirements is a sop to the right wing,” said John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees. “The GOP has insisted on huge federal retirement cuts in the highway bill and payroll tax conference, and this only serves to fan the flames.”</p>
<p>There are several proposals pending in Congress that would extend the federal pay freeze and raise the amount feds contribute to their retirement benefits. For a list of some of those proposals, see our <a href="http://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/pay-benefits-watch/2012/02/pay-and-benefits-roundup/41142/"><span style="color: #1e6caa;">Feb. 9 Pay and Benefits Watch</span></a> column.</p>
<p>“Some people may say that at least it’s not as bad as the Republican proposals,” said Carl Goldman, “That’s a heck of a standard to judge what is correct and just.”executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 26.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.afgelocal1923.org/2012/02/15/presidents-budget-makes-pay-raise-proposal-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

